THE AMERICAN PARTY

                                                 CHAPTER TEN

A Warning From America's Past : The Official Expulsion of Jews From Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky, Upon a 24-Hour Notice.

     On December 17, 1862, during the American Civil War, Major-General Ulysses S. Grant did issue General Order Number 11. It ordered the expulsion of all Jews in his military district, comprising areas of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky. Upon the overwhelming numbers of official reports that he had received, Grant was forced to believe that very well organized criminals were using massive thefts of cotton to make boundless fortunes, and that these criminals were Jews and their accomplices. Such Jews were very repeatedly implicated as the major participants in the cosmic fortunes made in the black market, war profiteering, and spying for the Confederacy.

     A second front appeared to consist of a monolithic Jewish press, well financed and well organized Jewish activists throughout the entire nation, wealthy Jewish political campaign donors, and a frightful and powerful Jewish lobby. Moreover,  his official investigations did implicate the powerful B'nai B'rith organization as being a spy agency for the most power and influential Southerner (arguably), the Secretary of State for the Confederacy, Juda P. Benjamin (a Jew).

    The Jews that suffered expulsion plainly controlled the President of the United States, and the President (Lincoln) controlled Grant. Indeed, Benjamin may have been a British subject (He was born in the British West Indies). But, he was certainly a Zionist who did know the teachings of the Talmud extremely well. Those who discovered him skulking in the shadows of Jefferson Davis believed him to be an extraordinarily powerful and influential  war profiteer who had only a disguised intense hatred for Christians, and especially Negro Christians.

     On 4 January 1863, President Lincoln rescinded the order. Benjamin and so many others (See the Union Secretary of War Simon Cameron), then, used their European bank accounts to become the wealthiest persons on earth.

     The aforesaid is a warning to Americans to reconsider any allegations that intend to cause brother to murder brother. Grant was a witness that tried to give a warning. Other witnesses believe that only a translation and knowledge of what the Talmud and the Torah actually teaches is all that Christians and Goyim need to defend themselves. These witnesses, plainly and irrefutably, include the father of Protestantism (Martin Luther), a great many Popes, a dear German soldier (Alfred Roth), and the last great hero (Elizabeth Dilling). 

     May the defendant in the trial of Indictment 6804.84, New York County (Frederick Alexander Jones), therefore, respectfully submit irrefutable facts that infer the character of those who used routine depraved conspiracies that included the following : (a) the deliberate failures of the defense attorney to object to very plain violations of the defendant's fourteenth amendment due process and equal protection rights, (b) the deliberate failures of the court reporters to record such violations (resulting in the deliberate use of fraudulent trial transcripts), (c) the inability to cause self-representation, (d) the inability to replace the defense lawyer, (e) and the threats of the presiding judges to remove the defendant from the courtroom upon his very first apparent disagreement with his defense attorney. The courtrooms almost never had any public attendance, there was no meaningful outside contacts, the defendant often entered such courtrooms immediately after suffering an unconsciousness due to the deliberate denials of appropriate medical care (by apparent foreign nationals), and such courtrooms were the darkest places on earth.

    

          1. A LIE :

          The extraordinarily vindicating medical records, upon which subsequent determinations were very plainly based, were hospital records that contained the "final diagnosis", clearly indicating "NO TRAUMA". The arresting officer, the defense attorney, the presiding judges, and the prosecutor did very hatefully deliberately misrepresent the truth by relying upon such records as the essential support for the prosecutor's case (See Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 [1967], 6; see, also, People's Exhibit #2 [Gloria Gonzales, a.k.a. Gloria Rivera, Metropolitan Hospital Center, 1901 First Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10029, Admission : 19 September 1984, Discharge : 10 October 1984, Chart # 100-73-55). See Indictment 6804.84, New York County. 

  

          2. A LIE : 

          On 10 October 1985, in Part 54, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, at 111 Centre Street, New York, N.Y. 10013, before Justice Myriam Altman (a Jew),  Psychiatrist Doctor Robert L. Goldstein (a Jew) read a report, under oath, intended to cause the indefinite psychiatric commitment of the defendant. He took, at least 30 minutes to simply read this report. No one had even seen a copy, and no one else had a clue about the specific facts alleged in this report. The defendant testified that he never suggested that he wanted to see any doctor for anything other his chronic asthmatic condition. He did, also, testify under oath, that almost every word of the aforesaid report of Doctor Goldstein was a lie. It was a very enormous lie, one that no human being could produce under oath. This testimony occurred precisely one year after the complaining witness (Gloria Rivera [who was born Gloria Moray (a Jew)]) had been discharged from the aforesaid hospital. 

     Judge Altman did disregard the most basic and plainly required Fourteenth Amendment due process procedures and equal protection rights. Accordingly, she hatefully committed the defendant without a single objection from the defense counsel, and the defendant's appropriate protests were  ignored. All evidence, other than the very enormous lie of Doctor Goldstein, indicated a person with no evidence of a mental health history and no suggestion of a mental health issue of any kind (after being forced to submit to three thorough inquiries that used required due process procedural protections). The aforesaid commitment to an indefinite further incarceration was a very flagrant lie and a willful violation of the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and of the equal protection of the law. Moreover, such stigmas are almost impossible to remove. 

     The Fourteenth Amendment required that, to subject the defendant to a further ordeal, a proper further order of examination (with the required procedural safeguards ) must be issued. See, e.g. PEOPLE v CHRISTOPHER, 65 N.Y.2d 417 (Ct. App. 1985), 423,424. Indeed, the lies have no end. 

See Indictment 6804.84, New York County. See, also, People v. Del Rio, 220 A.D.2d 122 (1996), 126 : The general rule of statutory construction.

   

          3. A LIE :

          On 19 November 1987, in Part 56 of the Criminal Term of the New York State Supreme Court in NewYork County, 100 Centre Street, New York, New York 10013, before Justice Harold J. Rothwax and a jury, the trial of Indictment Number 6804.84, New York County was in progress. The event was an off-the-record presentation of all of the exhibits on the evidence table. This included approximately six stacks of psychiatric records. Each of them stood approximately three feet high and were all bogus and plainly extraordinarily  prejudicial. Moreover, the defense attorney (Michael Monaghan) insisted that the presiding judge ordered the defendant to remain outside of the deliberation room while the presentation of these exhibits occurred inside. Monaghan alleged that the prosecutor wanted the defendant to carefully inspect People's Exhibit Number 2 (The 1984 hospital records). He did this, while his hateful defense lawyer constantly glared at him. "It appears that the  judge is going to describe you as a lunatic with a very long history of violent acts and very serious mental illnesses (an enormous lie)" said the defense lawyer to his client. The court  reporter did not enter the aforesaid deliberation room, apparently. No consent was apparently given by anyone for this kind of presentation (an off-the-records trial in a closed room, inside a courtroom that had no public attendance). Rothwax had grossly deliberately misrepresented the trial exhibits, and told the jurors a depraved lie.

     Indeed, again, the defendant suffered the willful denials of his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights. Compare People v. Ciaccio, 47 N.Y.2d 431 (1979), 436 : "In every criminal proceeding, a defendant has an absolute right to be present, with counsel, 'whenever  his presence has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend against the charge' (Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 105-106; People ex rel. Bartlam v. Murphy, N.Y.2d 550, 553; People v. Tyler, 14 A.D.2d 609; N.Y. Const. art. 1, sect. 6)." The emphasis is mine. This necessarily includes receiving evidence. 

   

          4. A LIE : 

           On 20 November 1987, in Part 56, Criminal Term, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, 100 Centre Street, New York, New York 10013, before Judge Harold J. Rothwax and a jury, the trial of  Indictment Number 6804.84 was in progress. The complaining witness (Gloria Charlotte Rivera, a.k.a. Gloria Garcia, a.k.a. Gloria Charlotte Revelli, a.k.a. Gloria Moray [name at birth]) had been sworn in as a witness, and she began he testimony under direct examination.

     The defendant was very surprised, when she gave a testimony that was extremely vindicating and consistent with the testimony that the defendant gave at the same trial. The court reporter did not record this event, and all of the other court officers appeared to totally disregard it. Then, she gave a hateful inculpatory testimony that supported the outrageous indictment. No objection was made.

     Upon cross-examination, the defense attorney continued to totally disregard her directly contradicting sworn statements. Both the prosecutor and the defense attorney did know the actual contents of the aforesaid People's Exhibit Number 2, did know the specific enormous lie that this witness had told under oath, and did nothing.

     See, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86 (A.D.2d Dept. 1974), 88 : Evidence that is impossible to believe, because it self-contradictory, is to be disregarded as being without evidentiary  value (citations omitted). Compare, United States v. Cronic, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984), 659 : "No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974), because the petitioner had been "denied the right of effective cross-examination " which " 'would be a constitutional error of the first magnitude and no amount of showing of want of prejudice would cure it.' " (citations omitted).

   

     Elizabeth Dilling did discover a hole in centuries of ignorance, and did repeat the warnings that Martin Luther made (Martin Luther, On the Jews and Their Lies, Luth. Wittenberg, H. Lufft, 1543). 

See, The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today, by Elizabeth Dilling, Chapter III, p. 12 : "They (Christians) rank not as animals, like the rest of non-Talmudic humanity, but almost as vermin, to be eradicated. Language in the Talmud is virtually exhausted to find foul and hated names for Christians.
     
          5. A LIE :
         The defendant in the case having indictment number 6804.84 (New York County) was in prison and in an absolute custody that could not end before 25 years of his life had passed. Moreover, the very great mental health and criminal conviction stigmata will never end. Nevertheless, he began to do all that is possible to find what was put into his file when he was a new york city police officer (shield number 2492). Indeed, he used the Freedom of Information Act (New York Public Officers Law, §§ 84-90). Then, upon refusals, he used the appropriate court (JONES v. N.Y.C.P.D., Index Number 42634.92 [New York County]). Upon further denials, he appealed (also as a layman) and won. He was given all requested items, apparently.
     The redaction of the score of documents, that was given to the defendant, upon court order, was very plainly a total failure. Accordingly, the names of countless police officers (almost all foreign nationals [police officers who were Puerto Rican]) had falsely accused the defendant of dozens of very serious crimes that were often preposterous. Most of these felonies could be almost immediately proven to be lies. The names of those who permitted this massive manufacturing of evidence were not given. The defendant never received any indication that these lies were being put into the his file (excepting a drug test taken immediately before entering the new york city police department and read to the jurors, without the objection of the defense counsel).
     When considering the above lies, one must always know that a fraud upon the court is never a fraud upon the presiding judge. "As a general proposition, jurisdiction is vested in the courts, not in judges (People v. Grant [1979], 77 Ill. App.3d 673, 675, 396 N.E.2d 656, 657.)," according to the opinion of the court, delivered by Mr. JUSTICE LINDBERG, People v. Zajic, 410 N.E.2d 626, 88 Ill. App.3d 412, 414, 43 Ill. Dec. 626 (App. Ct. 1980).
     Moreover, one must also always know that the aforesaid conduct consists of crimes for which Mr. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court : "The language of Section 241 is plain and unlimited. As we have discussed, its language embraces all of the rights and privileges secure to citizens by all the constitution and all of the laws of the United States. There is no indication in the language that the sweep of the section is confined to rights that are conferred by or 'flow from' the Federal Government, as distinguished from those secured or confirmed or guaranteed by the constitution." See United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966), 800.
     Today, in the year 2015, very few people know about the Criminal Civil Rights Statutes, and most never even heard about it. "These national civil rights statutes were never repealed, they were simply ignored," according to Joy A. Sigler, "The Civil War and the Rights of African Americans", published in Civil Rights in America 1500 - To Present (Michigan : Gale Research, 1998). page 90.

  

                                                                   

  

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                                                  CHAPTER NINE

A FURTHER LOOK AT LYNCHINGS BY FOREIGN NATIONALS : 

In 1937,  upon a fraud investigation, the Immigration and Naturalization Services in the State of New York was discovered to have employed criminals who made fraudulent immigration documents. "174 indictments were handed down in fraudulent naturalization cases." See Patrick Weil, The Sovereign Citizen: Denaturalization and the Origins of the American Republic, University of Pennsylvania Press, November 29, 2012 (accessed July 5, 2015), page 49.  These crimes  apparently had no effect on the enforcement of immigration laws. Indeed, Patrick Weil did use the same page to disclose that Congress asked Roosevelt to remove the Secretary of Labor for flagrantly refusing to enforce such laws.

     Modern American government was discovered to be having its own employees make and sell the most important government documents, and an appropriate response has never even begun. By the year 2000 permanent residency in the United States, that includes the best employments and all the benefits, could be achieved by any foreign national without much effort.  When appropriate, the permanent resident mush be investigated or seriously suspected of immigration fraud, regardless of how authentic the documents appear to be. 

      Accordingly, the extremely easily obtained birth certificate "is really the document of choice" for illegal immigrants, according to James R. Hess, Chief intelligence Officer at the Forensic Document Laboratory (at I.N.S., in the year 2000). He insists that, with the fraudulent birth certificate, a social security card, a driver's license, and a passport can be very easily obtained. See RENWICK McLEAN, "False Birth Certificates Let Immigrants Outwit System," New York Times, May 29, 2000 (accessed on July 8, 2015). During a very great many previous decades, the most undesirable and defective aliens used the most criminal frauds very easily, and became the most abominable tyrants while posing as American citizens.
     The aforesaid permits the introduction of Judge  Robert Kaufman. He literally led a government mob, during the McCarthy era, and lynched (murdered) a sweet little lady who was very plainly a paragon of moral principals. She was Ethel Rosenberg, and her trial never suggested the protection of fundamental due process rights. Her little white hands were strapped in, and smoke had to rise from her little head before the government doctor could pronounce her dead. Moreover, Kaufman used constant police protection to watch him and his family every minute of every day that followed.

     Kaufman had not only denied to her and her husband (Julius Rosenberg) the vindication of their most fundamental rights (his primary duty), he climbed into the very gutter that Joseph McCarthy was in, insanely accused her of starting the Korean war, starting a nuclear-bomb race, and refused to listen to law enforcement's request not to execute her.  Kaufman was plainly an anti-Stalinist and  despised all Jews who were against Israel and pro-Stalinist. 

    It is also plain that he was a defective knave from the time of his birth, and was among the many millions of permanent residents who were here as a direct result of fraudulent documentation.

     The judges in the defendant's case (the case of Frederick Alexander Jones) must be suspected in this light. Such judges routinely demonstrate depravity, and are tyrants to American citizens.

Patrick Weil

                                                              

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                                                 CHAPTER EIGHT

The Hateful Arrest and American Society's Outrageous Search for the Truth

     On October 9th 1984, the defendant, Frederick Alexander Jones, was arrested by the fraudulent use of extraordinarily vindicating medical records. At the arraignment, a new york legal aid society lawyer represented him without any suggestion that the defendant permitted him to do so.  This lawyer told the judge a very long list of lies that were a false story of a very long history of mental illness. Actually, the defendant never spoke to a psychiatrist nor a psychologist prior to that time. When the defendant attempted to speak to the judge, the judge became furious and angrily ordered him not to say a single word. "Your lawyer is representing you !" he yelled at the defendant. This demonstrated a criminal scheme, and the judge was complicit.

     Later that month, in a segregated area within a very massive atrium of prison cells, a very loud and very constant wheezing could be heard everywhere. The medical staff were apparently foreign nationals, and they denied to the defendant most of his asthma medications. He, for many weeks, was literally drowning, and nearly died on several occasions. It was generally known that a guilty plea would result in a change of prisons and adequate medical care. Moreover, the fraudulent use of the aforesaid medical records would not be sought to be disclosed by the defendant (personally) in a possible trial, if such a plea could be coerced.

     The criminal betrayal by the defense lawyer (The New York Legal Aid Society) had been made easy by the United States Supreme Court. Accordingly, earlier that year (May 14, 1984) Sandra Day O'Connor wrote a decision that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by the counsel's inadequate performance. The indigent defendant took a great blow. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

    "The counsel is strongly presumed to have rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment" (466 U.S. 668,690). In addition, "A particular  decision not to investigate must be directly assessed for reasonableness in all the circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to the counsel's judgments" (466 U.S. 668, 691). It follows that in a routinely empty criminal courtroom that has a routinely hateful conspiracy among officers of the court (including the judge, the defense lawyer, and the court reporter) many circumstances will be deliberately suppressed, and the trial transcripts will be a routine fraud. 

     Upon the foregoing, the Press (the monolithic media) and its readers (those who access the internet and newspapers) must plainly use contemporary public scrutiny  (open hearings) as the last hope in the search for the truth. Please, consider Oswald Arnold Gottfried Spengler:

     "What is the truth? For the multitude, that which it continually reads and hears. A forlorn little drop my  settle somewhere and collect grounds on which to determine "the truth" - but what it obtains is just its truth. The other, the public truth of the moment, which alone matters for effects and success in the fact-world, is to-day a product of the Press. What the Press wills, is true. Its commanders evoke, transform, interchange truths. Three weeks of press work, and the truth is acknowledged by everyone." See, The Decline of the West: The Complete Edition, Oswald Spengler, Alfred A. Knopf: New York, Volume Two, 1926, Translation by Charles Francis Atkinson, page 462.
     Spengler continues to describe the aforesaid Press on page 463:
     " It can condemn any "truth" to death simply by not undertaking its communication to the world - a terrible censorship of silence, which is all the more potent in that the masses of news paper readers are absolutely unaware that it exists".
     

                                                                         

                                                           Oswald Arnold Gottfried Spengler

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                                                  CHAPTER SEVEN

FOREIGN NATIONALS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO BE TYRANTS AND ROUTINELY PERSECUTE COUNTLESS INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS

     When considering injustice in America's criminal justice systems, one must always consider the innocent citizens first. Upon further consideration, the presiding judges who claim a preposterous dual citizenship while claiming to vindicate the rights of the accused must be considered before all other judges. Indeed, the aforesaid judges, Myriam Altman and Harold J. Rothwax did use the routine hideous darkness of the court and the routine hateful conspiracy among court officers to willfully deprive Frederick Alexander Jones of his constitutional (Fourteenth Amendment) rights to due process and the equal protection of the law. They were both citizens of Israel, at that time.
     They came when many millions of Zionist entered America. The immigration laws were never more severe, and they were almost never enforced. Fraud appeared to be worst in York City.
The papers that were needed to become a naturalized citizen were purchased there. The new york city officials were apparently all corrupt. See, After they Closed the Gates : Jewish Illegal Immigration to the United States, 1921-1965, Libby Garland, The University of Chicago Press Books, 2014, pp. 89,91,94,107,108.
     Frederick Alexander Jones does know that the greatest achievement in all of the efforts in human history, The Great Wall of China, was made almost useless by the bribing of public officials (the gate keepers). Today, the gates of America are routinely defeated by the same absence of character; and, the cowardice in its monolithic media causes an absence of reporting. Indeed, the effort of those who watch is limited by the fear of not gaining access to government.
     Genghis Khan was alleged to have said "The strength of a wall depends on the courage of those who defend it."
                                                                     

   

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                

                                                  CHAPTER SIX

                                                 

 THE PLEDGE OF THE AMERICAN PARTY    

We declare the following:

  

1. "Lynching" is any willful deprivation of any person's fundamental due process right.
2. "Lynching" is described by and prohibited by the United States Criminal Civil Rights Statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241,242).
3. The absolute right to unrestricted public access to all trials and public hearings must include the absolute right to contemporaneous public scrutiny.
4. Without publicity all other checks are of small account (In Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 268-271 [1948]).
5. The greatest and rankest of all criminals are the American court officers who routinely lynch plainly innocent African-American defendants in the hideous darkness of courtrooms that have no public attendance, as the monolithic media primes the public to believe that such conditions can never exist.
6. Most lynchings occur in New York and other states in the north of the United States, as deliberately overwhelming caseloads permit the fate of all innocent defendants to be determined by mere horse trading in the chambers of judges who alleged to be loyal to two nations or other foreign nationals who should have been denaturalized. 
7. The American system of criminal justice can only be  described as assembly-line criminal justice, where the innocent are used as frightening examples to all who dare to exercise their fundamental right to a jury trial (typically without public attendance and without publicity).
8. Lynching is  an indefensible crime, destructive of all principles of government, hateful and hostile to every ideal of religion and humanity, debasing and degrading to every person involved.
9. Public opinion had accepted too easily the claim of lynchers and mobsters that they are acting solely in defense of womanhood.
10. In light of the facts we dare no longer to permit this claim to pass unchallenged, nor allow those bent upon personal revenge and the rankest of all knavery to commit hidden and cowardly acts in the name of women.
11. We solemnly pledge ourselves to create a new public opinion in America, which will not condone, for any reason whatever, acts of government mobs or government lynchers.
12. We will teach our children at home, at school and at church a new interpretation of the law and religion.
13. We will assist all officials to uphold their oath of office.
14. We will join with every minister, editor, school teacher and patriotic citizen in a program of education to eradicate lynchings and government mobs from our land.     

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                     

                                                  CHAPTER FIVE

THE DAY A GLIMMER OF SUNLIGHT BEAMED INTO THE HIDEOUS DARKNESS OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

  

     On July 22,1987, in the  X-Parte  Motion Part of the Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, 600 East 125th Street, New York, New York 10035 (C# 044-0700259, upon Indictment Number 6804.84, N.Y. County), and before Justice Hughes, the patient-defendant (Frederick Alexander Jones) stood, for the first time and the last time in his life, in a public hearing, a real public hearing.

The contemporaneous public scrutiny that is plainly required for public hearings took the form of about two dozen law students and law professors from Columbia University. The patient-defendant ,alone, had used his fundamental right of self-representation to submit a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his further incarceration and further stigmatizing was plainly unlawful. 

     The patient-defendant, however, did know that his most fundamental rights would never be vindicated in the routine and hideous darkness of America's courts. He, therefore, caused an appropriate public attendance at this public hearing. The treatment of the petitioner, even in this public hearing, was flagrantly unfair and outrageous. The entire public stood up in anger, and the petitioner was determined to be unlawfully incarcerated (further incarcerated by Judge Harold J. Rothwax) and released from the hospital. The dual citizenship and disdain for America's Constitution had caused Rothwax to be, in the hideous routine darkness of the America's courtrooms,  a frightful tyrant for whom his confederate criminals called "Yahweh" and "The Prince of Dankness."

     The very obvious direct cause of the aforesaid unlawful incarceration was the very outrageous commitment order of a former refugee from Nazi occupied Europe, Judge Myriam Altman. She used the plain and massive perjury of Doctor Robert Lloyd Goldstein (license # 098116, on October 10, 1985, in Part 54, 111 Centre Street, New York, New York 10013) for whom the defendant was forced ,by his lawyer and by numerous physical threats, to sit silently in the area of a garage under the courthouse. This period was alleged to be an interview that resulted in voluminous evidence against the defendant, sending him into repeated outrageous psychiatirc commitments and perminant debilitating stigmata. 

     The defendant's repeated denials of the plainly outrageous alleged bloody beating to the scull of the complaining witness (Gloria Rivera, a.k.a. Gloria Charolottee Rivelli, a.k.a. Gloria Garcia, 201 West 89th Street, Apt. 2C, New York, N.Y. 10024) sent this tyrant into a rage. She made herself a witness. She, nor Rothwax, are the courts that they preside in. They are complicit, along with the legal aid society lawyer, in such frauds. See People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App. 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626 (1980)  (A judge is not the court).
     Altman immigrated when the enforcement of immigration laws did not exist. Rothwax presided in American courts while alleging loyalty to both Israel and America, and was plainly permitted to demonstrate his disregard for the United States Constitution (as court reporters used the absence of contemporaneous public scrutiny to suppress all willful deprivations of fundamental due process rights). The subsequent fraudulent trial transcripts were an additional fraud, a fraud upon the appellate court.  Indeed, the threat to America is plainly the fact that foreign nationals in America are not only allowed to commit crimes against ordinary American citizens, they are allowed to be tyrants without restraints. The period of Altman's 1941 entry into the United States may be considered.
     "Since January 1940, Roosevelt had been under pressure from Congress to remove Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins from her post. She had been accused of not enforcing immigration laws when she lobbied to welcome Jewish refugees from Europe and obtained the right to remain for German Jewish visitors already in the United States at the outbreak of World War II." See The Sovereign Citizen : Denaturalization and the Origins of the American Republic, by Patrick Weil, University of Pennsylvania Press, page 49, November 29, 2012, accessed on July 8, 2015.
     Moreover, in New York, in 1937, "174 indictments were handed down in fraudulent naturalization  cases" (Ibid.). In addition, for the year of 1937, 3,336 aliens were arrested for deportation proceedings (Ibid.) Of course, the mother of fascism, Margherita Grassini Sarfatti, was forced out of Italy in 1938. See Saviona Mane, "Mussolini's Jewish Love Who Crafted Italian Fascism," Haaretz, November 23,2014, accessed July 8, 2015. Europe was forcing criminals and many other unsavory groups out, and into the arms of an America that allowed its immigration laws to join its criminal civil rights laws (allowed to be gravely  important laws that are totally ignored). These laws had almost no enforcement at this time. Millions entered American, just as they do today, with fraudulent documents or no documents at all. Those that arrive lobby to increase their numbers and their control of the American governments at all levels. They have contempt for fundamental due process rights.



   

                                                                   

       
                                                          Margherita Grassini Sarfatti  
 
                                                         (A refugee and the mother of fascism)                                        

Lyudmila Pavlichenko

     

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                           

                                                  CHAPTER FOUR

     By March 7, 2015, the defendant (Frederick Alexander Jones, Indictment Number 6804.84, New York County) had made several compelling supplications to the attorneys who represented him at trial and on the direct appeal. Accordingly, the attorneys who explicitly described themselves as the successors to these attorneys (Seymour W. James of the New York Legal Aid Society and Richard M. Greenberg of the Office of the Appellate Defender) did not ever give to the defendant a meaningful response upon his many supplications for plainly vindicating medical records.
     New York County District Attorney  Cyrus R. Vance had used his Record Access Officer to demand such a response in writing, and as a precondition before he would give to me a copy of the aforesaid medical records.

      Very obviously, the conduct of these well informed attorneys is "aiding and abetting a violation of fiduciary duties". Indeed, the respective defense attorneys have plainly and hatefully agreed to hide these medical records (hospital records [People's Exhibit Number Two]), evidence upon which the entire case is irrefutably based. This conduct is a routine conspiracy among court officers, and it is seldom understood by other lawyers. It is Fraud upon the Court.

     The prosecutor had very deliberately grossly misrepresented this extraordinarily vindicating evidence to the Grand Jury and to the petit Jury. The defense attorney ( Michael Monaghan of the Legal Aid Society), after being made aware and after conceding the very gross misrepresentations, did all that is possible to conceal this hateful conduct from the court. The presiding judge, Harold J. Rothwax, joined Monaghan when he glared at me before the jurors. See Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1, 6, 7 (1967). It is a White-female-victim case.

     The language of the Criminal Civil Rights Statutes describe, very plainly and very comprehensively, that this conduct is a willful deprivation of the defendant's most fundamental due process rights, that the court officers involved in this routine conspiracy are the rankest of all criminals. See, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241,242.

     This aforesaid conduct defines a lynching to all who can find the courage to participate in the hue and cry. To such persons, the language of section 241 is plain and unlimited. It "embraces all of the rights and privileges secured to citizens by all of the constitution and all of the laws of the United States." See United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 800 (1966).

     Rothwax was a fervent Zionist who held two citizenships. In his book "Guilty" (Harold J. Rothwax, Guilty: The Collapse of Criminal Justice [New York: Random House, 1996], at page 204) he demonstrated a boundless distain for jury trials, and considered, insanely, that a plea of "Innocent" is offensive. There were no jury trials in Israel  ("Israel has never had one [a jury system]", at page 220). Dual citizenships must be reconsidered. America is for Americans.