THE AMERICAN PARTY

Thursday, July 30, 2015

THE AMERICAN PARTY


                                                  CHAPTER SEVEN


FOREIGN NATIONALS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO BE TYRANTS AND ROUTINELY PERSECUTE COUNTLESS INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS

     When considering injustice in America's criminal justice systems, one must always consider the innocent citizens first. Upon further consideration, the presiding judges who claim a preposterous dual citizenship while claiming to vindicate the rights of the accused must be considered before all other judges. Indeed, the aforesaid judges, Myriam Altman and Harold J. Rothwax did use the routine hideous darkness of the court and the routine hateful conspiracy among court officers to willfully deprive Frederick Alexander Jones of his constitutional (Fourteenth Amendment) rights to due process and the equal protection of the law. They were both citizens of Israel, at that time.
     They came when many millions of Zionist entered America. The immigration laws were never more severe, and they were almost never enforced. Fraud appeared to be worst in York City.
The papers that were needed to become a naturalized citizen were purchased there. The new york city officials were apparently all corrupt. See, After they Closed the Gates : Jewish Illegal Immigration to the United States, 1921-1965, Libby Garland, The University of Chicago Press Books, 2014, pp. 89,91,94,107,108.
     Frederick Alexander Jones does know that the greatest achievement in all of the efforts in human history, The Great Wall of China, was made almost useless by the bribing of public officials (the gate keepers). Today, the gates of America are routinely defeated by the same absence of character; and, the cowardice in its monolithic media causes an absence of reporting. Indeed, the effort of those who watch is limited by the fear of not gaining access to government.
     Genghis Khan was alleged to have said "The strength of a wall depends on the courage of those who defend it."
                                                                     
   

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                

                                                  CHAPTER SIX

                                                 

 THE PLEDGE OF THE AMERICAN PARTY    


We declare the following:
  
  1. "Lynching" is any willful deprivation of any person's fundamental due process right.
  2. "Lynching" is described by and prohibited by the United States Criminal Civil Rights Statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241,242).
  3. The absolute right to unrestricted public access to all trials and public hearings must include the absolute right to contemporaneous public scrutiny.
  4. Without publicity all other checks are of small account (In Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 268-271 [1948]).
  5. The greatest and rankest of all criminals are the American court officers who routinely lynch plainly innocent African-American defendants in the hideous darkness of courtrooms that have no public attendance, as the monolithic media primes the public to believe that such conditions can never exist.
  6. Most lynchings occur in New York and other states in the north of the United States, as deliberately overwhelming caseloads permit the fate of all innocent defendants to be determined by mere horse trading in the chambers of judges who alleged to be loyal to two nations or other foreign nationals who should have been denaturalized. 
  7. The American system of criminal justice can only be  described as assembly-line criminal justice, where the innocent are used as frightening examples to all who dare to exercise their fundamental right to a jury trial (typically without public attendance and without publicity).
  8. Lynching is  an indefensible crime, destructive of all principles of government, hateful and hostile to every ideal of religion and humanity, debasing and degrading to every person involved.
  9. Public opinion had accepted too easily the claim of lynchers and mobsters that they are acting solely in defense of womanhood.
  10. In light of the facts we dare no longer to permit this claim to pass unchallenged, nor allow those bent upon personal revenge and the rankest of all knavery to commit hidden and cowardly acts in the name of women.
  11. We solemnly pledge ourselves to create a new public opinion in America, which will not condone, for any reason whatever, acts of government mobs or government lynchers.
  12. We will teach our children at home, at school and at church a new interpretation of the law and religion.
  13. We will assist all officials to uphold their oath of office.
  14. We will join with every minister, editor, school teacher and patriotic citizen in a program of education to eradicate lynchings and government mobs from our land.     


Tuesday, July 7, 2015

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                     

                                                  CHAPTER FIVE

THE DAY A GLIMMER OF SUNLIGHT BEAMED INTO THE HIDEOUS DARKNESS OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

  
     On July 22,1987, in the  X-Parte  Motion Part of the Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, 600 East 125th Street, New York, New York 10035 (C# 044-0700259, upon Indictment Number 6804.84, N.Y. County), and before Justice Hughes, the patient-defendant (Frederick Alexander Jones) stood, for the first time and the last time in his life, in a public hearing, a real public hearing.
The contemporaneous public scrutiny that is plainly required for public hearings took the form of about two dozen law students and law professors from Columbia University. The patient-defendant ,alone, had used his fundamental right of self-representation to submit a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his further incarceration and further stigmatizing was plainly unlawful. 
     The patient-defendant, however, did know that his most fundamental rights would never be vindicated in the routine and hideous darkness of America's courts. He, therefore, caused an appropriate public attendance at this public hearing. The treatment of the petitioner, even in this public hearing, was flagrantly unfair and outrageous. The entire public stood up in anger, and the petitioner was determined to be unlawfully incarcerated (further incarcerated by Judge Harold J. Rothwax) and released from the hospital. The dual citizenship and disdain for America's Constitution had caused Rothwax to be, in the hideous routine darkness of the America's courtrooms,  a frightful tyrant for whom his confederate criminals called "Yahweh" and "The Prince of Dankness."
     The very obvious direct cause of the aforesaid unlawful incarceration was the very outrageous commitment order of a former refugee from Nazi occupied Europe, Judge Myriam Altman. She used the plain and massive perjury of Doctor Robert Lloyd Goldstein (license # 098116, on October 10, 1985, in Part 54, 111 Centre Street, New York, New York 10013) for whom the defendant was forced ,by his lawyer and by numerous physical threats, to sit silently in the area of a garage under the courthouse. This period was alleged to be an interview that resulted in voluminous evidence against the defendant, sending him into repeated outrageous psychiatirc commitments and perminant debilitating stigmata. 
     The defendant's repeated denials of the plainly outrageous alleged bloody beating to the scull of the complaining witness (Gloria Rivera, a.k.a. Gloria Charolottee Rivelli, a.k.a. Gloria Garcia, 201 West 89th Street, Apt. 2C, New York, N.Y. 10024) sent this tyrant into a rage. She made herself a witness. She, nor Rothwax, are the courts that they preside in. They are complicit, along with the legal aid society lawyer, in such frauds. See People v. Zajic, 88 Ill. App. 3d 477, 410 N.E. 2d 626 (1980)  (A judge is not the court).
     Altman immigrated when the enforcement of immigration laws did not exist. Rothwax presided in American courts while alleging loyalty to both Israel and America, and was plainly permitted to demonstrate his disregard for the United States Constitution (as court reporters used the absence of contemporaneous public scrutiny to suppress all willful deprivations of fundamental due process rights). The subsequent fraudulent trial transcripts were an additional fraud, a fraud upon the appellate court.  Indeed, the threat to America is plainly the fact that foreign nationals in America are not only allowed to commit crimes against ordinary American citizens, they are allowed to be tyrants without restraints. The period of Altman's 1941 entry into the United States may be considered.
     "Since January 1940, Roosevelt had been under pressure from Congress to remove Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins from her post. She had been accused of not enforcing immigration laws when she lobbied to welcome Jewish refugees from Europe and obtained the right to remain for German Jewish visitors already in the United States at the outbreak of World War II." See The Sovereign Citizen : Denaturalization and the Origins of the American Republic, by Patrick Weil, University of Pennsylvania Press, page 49, November 29, 2012, accessed on July 8, 2015.
     Moreover, in New York, in 1937, "174 indictments were handed down in fraudulent naturalization  cases" (Ibid.). In addition, for the year of 1937, 3,336 aliens were arrested for deportation proceedings (Ibid.) Of course, the mother of fascism, Margherita Grassini Sarfatti, was forced out of Italy in 1938. See Saviona Mane, "Mussolini's Jewish Love Who Crafted Italian Fascism," Haaretz, November 23,2014, accessed July 8, 2015. Europe was forcing criminals and many other unsavory groups out, and into the arms of an America that allowed its immigration laws to join its criminal civil rights laws (allowed to be gravely  important laws that are totally ignored). These laws had almost no enforcement at this time. Millions entered American, just as they do today, with fraudulent documents or no documents at all. Those that arrive lobby to increase their numbers and their control of the American governments at all levels. They have contempt for fundamental due process rights.



   

                                                                   
       
                                                          Margherita Grassini Sarfatti  
 
                                                         (A refugee and the mother of fascism)                                        





Lyudmila Pavlichenko





     

Monday, June 29, 2015

THE AMERICAN PARTY

                           

                                                  CHAPTER FOUR

     By March 7, 2015, the defendant (Frederick Alexander Jones, Indictment Number 6804.84, New York County) had made several compelling supplications to the attorneys who represented him at trial and on the direct appeal. Accordingly, the attorneys who explicitly described themselves as the successors to these attorneys (Seymour W. James of the New York Legal Aid Society and Richard M. Greenberg of the Office of the Appellate Defender) did not ever give to the defendant a meaningful response upon his many supplications for plainly vindicating medical records.
     New York County District Attorney  Cyrus R. Vance had used his Record Access Officer to demand such a response in writing, and as a precondition before he would give to me a copy of the aforesaid medical records.
      Very obviously, the conduct of these well informed attorneys is "aiding and abetting a violation of fiduciary duties". Indeed, the respective defense attorneys have plainly and hatefully agreed to hide these medical records (hospital records [People's Exhibit Number Two]), evidence upon which the entire case is irrefutably based. This conduct is a routine conspiracy among court officers, and it is seldom understood by other lawyers. It is Fraud upon the Court.
     The prosecutor had very deliberately grossly misrepresented this extraordinarily vindicating evidence to the Grand Jury and to the petit Jury. The defense attorney ( Michael Monaghan of the Legal Aid Society), after being made aware and after conceding the very gross misrepresentations, did all that is possible to conceal this hateful conduct from the court. The presiding judge, Harold J. Rothwax, joined Monaghan when he glared at me before the jurors. See Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1, 6, 7 (1967). It is a White-female-victim case.
     The language of the Criminal Civil Rights Statutes describe, very plainly and very comprehensively, that this conduct is a willful deprivation of the defendant's most fundamental due process rights, that the court officers involved in this routine conspiracy are the rankest of all criminals. See, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241,242.
     This aforesaid conduct defines a lynching to all who can find the courage to participate in the hue and cry. To such persons, the language of section 241 is plain and unlimited. It "embraces all of the rights and privileges secured to citizens by all of the constitution and all of the laws of the United States." See United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787, 800 (1966).
     Rothwax was a fervent Zionist who held two citizenships. In his book "Guilty" (Harold J. Rothwax, Guilty: The Collapse of Criminal Justice [New York: Random House, 1996], at page 204) he demonstrated a boundless distain for jury trials, and considered, insanely, that a plea of "Innocent" is offensive. There were no jury trials in Israel  ("Israel has never had one [a jury system]", at page 220). Dual citizenships must be reconsidered. America is for Americans.
     

                                                                       

                                                                        

Monday, June 22, 2015

THE AMERICAN PARTY

   

                                                 CHAPTER THREE


 The American Party is the levy of a campaign against the most insidious and depraved crime in all of history: lynching. Unlike the lynchings that occurred in the South, before 1964, the lynchings in the North are hidden by routine criminal conspiracies among court officers and are done under the color of law (see 18 U.S.C. §§ 241,242).  The typical empty criminal courtroom will deprive the public of the required contemporaneous scrutiny, and the monolithic media will continue to grossly mislead the public into believing that such hideously dark courtrooms do not exist.
     Nevertheless, the methods of destroying the dastardly and depraved practice of lynching
African-Americans in the North were thoroughly developed by a lady of boundless courage, Jessie Daniel Ames.

   
  Indeed, between 1930 and 1940, Ms. Ames literally eliminated every lynching (recorded) in the United States. She used white women to approach the sites where lynching were rumored to occur.
She used her Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching (ASWPL). Constant very serious threats and harassment did not stop these ladies. By 1940, not a single lynching was recorded. The media hid her and her boundless courage; and, even today she is left in the darkness.
     She did know that the widely accepted myth that women needed protection from African-American men was usually a manufactured justification for a public lynching.

Monday, June 8, 2015

THE PUBLISHER CAN DO MANY IMPORTANT THINGS FOR YOUR COMPANY

                                                  

                                                 CHAPTER TWO

   
  Frederick Alexander Jones is clearly the preeminent authority on the subject of the most grievously wrongful convictions, convictions that are routinely accomplished in the hideous darkness of America's criminal courts. This blog allows anyone to view and understand the landscape of the greatest corruption in the world, America's criminal justice system. They will want this revelation, and the most ethical lawyers to help them reconsider their government.
     For example, when Jones states that nearly all of America's criminal courts are empty (as television and the media have never presented this fact and grossly misled America for many decades), such lawyers will confess that this is true.  Moreover, all the world guarantees a public trial for one accused of a serious crime, and for an extremely compelling reason.
     Another example, is the fact that America has become the Mecca and haven for the cowards, knaves, and degenerates as their money and America's secret proceedings will hide them. Accordingly, it is the only nation that inflicts such secret grand jury proceedings upon its citizens. It does little or nothing for the innocent. They must plead "guilty", and the worst criminals are treated to short prison stays or none at all. An ethical attorney will, also, confess this practice among lawyers.
     This blog is a hue and cry for those with courage to step forward, and save their dear country.
      Every step of the actual process that leads to arbitrary and hateful deprivations of the most fundamental constitutional and human rights is carefully presented as an essential caution to all.
     The foregoing will educate many lawyers and their prospective clients on each and every step towards these dastardly crimes against America.

Friday, May 22, 2015

THE MOST DASTARDLY CRIMES UNDER COLOR OF LAW

THE INEXCUSEABLE SUPPRESSIONS OF THE GREATEST WAR HERO THAT EVER LIVED  (FEMALE SOVIET SOLDIER LYUDMILA PAVLICHENKO) AND THE INDISPUTABLE GREATEST MILITARY VICTORY IN HUMAN HISTORY (OPERATION BAGRATION [1944]) ESTABLISH THE WORST CRIMES OF AMERICAN HISTORY, THE FRAUDS AND KNAVERIES OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AGAINST THEIR OWN CITIZENS : AN ETHICAL LAWYER AND A FAIR HEARING ARE LONG OVERDUE !  

                                                 CHAPTER ONE        

                                                                      

     In the month of November 1966, the defendant in a case having Indictment Number 6804.84, New  York County (Frederick Alexander Jones) had arrived in New York City. He was dressed in a military uniform and he was very proud. As an African-American, he did all that one can possibly do. He was alive, and I could feel his great honor. 
      For many hours, he sat in the cold air of Washington Square Park. His eyes were fixed on the building of the World Trade Center, and he had left so very many among the dead. Only he did know that he was the strongest, most intelligent, and most honorable person in the world. The cold skies smiled down, and everyone seemed to him to be his friend.
    Nevertheless, America would soon take his honor, as if he had stolen it. He would always want to be heard, but no one rose above an apathy that was the legacy of a hideous slavery. Indeed, the plainly appropriate laws (18 U.S.C. 241,242) were in the most flagrantly brazen disuse. They were totally ignored for a great many previous decades, and ethical lawyers had apparently been chased out of the legal profession.
     As a former new york city police officer (2492), in 1988, he heard his life being given away in an empty courtroom. The presiding judge had brazenly given to one of the most notorious American drug lords his honor and his life, as a gift on her 50th birthday (Eleanor Ann Holmes, D.O.B. January 11, 1938). Indeed, the deliberate gross misrepresentation of an extraordinarily vindicating medical record had been the obvious basis of all significant determinations. The prosecutor had used the predictable public apathy  to grossly misrepresent extraordinarily vindicating medical records (hospital records of the complaining witness). This is the hidden "grand highway" to many thousands of modern public lynchings in empty criminal courtrooms. Moreover, the public had always been primed to falsely believe that a jury trial (jurors being part of the court) may substitute for a public trial (a trial having public attendance); or, that all public trials have public attendance. This American propaganda is directed at American citizens; and, sustains the amoral, hideous and hidden slave society.  Indeed, the  darkness of a routinely empty criminal courtroom and the dastardly betrayals by the defendant's government lawyer did result in a depraved and routine criminal conspiracy among court officers that is the legacy of American slavery. Moreover, it is systemic, and plainly contributes to the very gross injustices that millions must face many times in their lives. Ethical lawyers are needed. A purge is also needed.
   
     The defendant will continue to add to this story, weekly or monthly. What he publishes will always be plainly verifiable.
Frederick Alexander Jones